The Science of Reviewing Research
Andrew D. Oxman, Gordon H. Guyatt
Obtaining useful information from expert based sources
via Information In Practice; David C Slawson, Allen F Shaughnessy
Clinical review articles
Should be as scientific as the articles they review
Quotation accuracy in review articles
Authors: Neihouse PF, Priske SC.
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
via J R Soc Med; Richard Smith
Peer-review practices of psychological journals
The fate of published articles, submitted again; Douglas P. Peters, Stephen J. Ceci
Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov
via NEMJ; Monique L. Anderson, M.D., Karen Chiswell, Ph.D., Eric D. Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., Asba Tasneem, Ph.D., James Topping, M.S., and Robert M. Califf, M.D.
The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting
Factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication
Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs
A practical guide; via Karin Ried
Evaluating the Usefulness of Review Articles
A worksheet to determine relevance and validity of review articles
Subscribe
